PSY 616 Case Study Two Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: This case study analysis is the second of the two formative tasks that will support your understanding of key course concepts and the elements of a successful consultation for an organization—that is, diagnosing problems, creating a plan to address the specific problems, and the practical implications of implementing a plan. These case study analyses will inform your approach for the two summative tasks: a third consulting case study analysis and the final product (a comprehensive consulting case study and action planfor a real-world organization).
Your module readings have discussed the various elements included in a needs assessment. Now, you will gain hands-on experience by conducting a specific piece of a needs assessment.
Prompt: Review the “Beta Oil” case study in Chapter 31 of Organization Development (pages 622–626). In your analysis of the case, specifically assess the effectiveness of the methods used by the consultant to assess the corporate culture.
In your 3- to 4-page analysis of the case study, summarize the key features of the situation very briefly and then analyze the organizational consulting methods used to assess corporate culture and their efficacy. Ensure that you address the following questions:
1. What did the organizational consultant do right in the assessment of corporate culture?
3. What was the most surprising finding of the cultural assessment?
4. What are your recommendations to improve the assessment of corporate culture?
Use at least two outside sources to support your position on the effectiveness of the current methods used to recruit and hire employees.
Guidelines for Submission:Double-spaced Word document, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, APA format. The case study analysis should be 3 to 4 pages in length (not including title page and references) and should integrate no fewer than two scholarly resources.
|Critical Elements||Exemplary||Proficient||Needs Improvement||Not Evident||Value|
|Diagnostic Methods: Identification||Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses specific and relevant details(14-15)||Accurately describes the organizational consulting methods used by the consultant to assess corporate culture(12-13)||Does not sufficiently describe the organizational consulting methods used by the consultant to assess corporate culture(11)||Does not describe the organizational consulting methods used by the consultant to assess corporate culture(0-10)||15|
|Diagnostic Methods: Defining Corporate Culture||Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates exceptional logic by using evidence provided within the case and examples from other research(23-25)||Analyzes the efficacy of the organizational consulting methods used to assess corporate culture(20-22)||Does not sufficiently analyze the efficacy of the organizational consulting methods used to assess corporate culture(18-19)||Does not provide any analysis of the efficacy of organizational consulting methods used(0-17)||25|
|Corporate Culture: Ethical Implications||Meets “Proficient” criteria with exceptional perception regarding the different viewpoints of stakeholders regarding the corporate culture(18-20)||Assesses the ethical implications of the corporate culture identified, considering the viewpoints of different stakeholders, specifically, managers, employees, and clients(16-17)||Assesses the ethical implications of the corporate culture identified, with limited consideration of the viewpoints of different stakeholders(14-15)||Does not assess the ethical implications of the corporate culture(0-13)||20|
|Recommendations||Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses research-based evidence to substantiate recommendations for corporate culture assessment(23-25)||Provides concrete suggestions for changes in the corporate culture assessment methods used(20-22)||Does not sufficiently provide concrete suggestions for changes in the corporate culture assessment(18-19)||Does not provide suggestions for changes in corporate culture assessment(0-17)||25|
|Articulation of Response||Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format(14-15)||Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization(12-13)||Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas(11)||Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas(0-10)||15|
The post Beta Oil Case Study appeared first on Smart Essays.